Better signing than Garnacho: Chelsea eyeing move for £100m PL "machine"

The sky is blue, water is wet, and Chelsea are once again making the most of the summer transfer window.

So far, the Blues have made several top-quality additions to Enzo Maresca’s side, such as Liam Delap and Joao Pedro.

Moreover, the West Londoners are also hard at work facilitating a number of exits for the likes of Nicolas Jackson, Kieran Dewsbury-Hall, and Christopher Nkunku.

Chelsea manager EnzoMarescabefore the start of the second half

Yet, the Conference League champions aren’t done there, as they continue to be linked with Alejandro Garnacho, although reports have also touted another international for a move to Stamford Bridge, someone who’d be a far better signing.

Chelsea target massive Garnacho upgrade

Chelsea have been linked with Garnacho for some time now, with reports touting the Manchester United ace for a move to West London popping up as far back as the winter window.

Transfer Focus

Mega money deals, controversial moves and big-name flops. This is the home of transfer news and opinion across Football FanCast.

However, the links have become far more concrete in recent weeks, no doubt in part thanks to the falling out between the Argentine and Ruben Amorim at the end of last season.

Should the Blues act on their supposed interest in the 21-year-old, reports suggest they’d need to stump up around £40m to secure his services, although while he could end up being a smart buy for Maresca and Co, they would be wise to sign another Premier League star they appear to be keen on: Morgan Rogers.

Yes, according to a recent report from The Athletic, Chelsea are still interested in the Aston Villa star this summer.

As things stand, the West Londoners have not acted on this interest, and the report makes no mention of how much the Englishman could cost in the coming weeks.

However, according to other stories from earlier this summer, it would seem that an offer of £100m would be enough to tempt the Claret and Blue into selling.

It would be a complicated and costly transfer to get over the line, but given Rogers’ immense ability and potential, it would be one worth fighting for, especially as he’d be a far better signing than Garnacho.

Why Rogers would be a far better signing than Garnacho

So, before we even get into their actual ability as players, the first big plus in Rogers’ favour is that, so far in his career, he has not caused problems for his team, nor has he fallen out with his manager and become a problem in the dressing room.

Aston Villa star Morgan Rogers

Unfortunately for Garnacho, as we’ve mentioned above, the same cannot be said, as not only did he have a rather public falling out with Amorim last season, but the manager even reportedly told him he’d have to “pray” another club came in for him this summer.

While there is every chance that Maresca will be able to control the Argentine in West London, it’s worth considering if he’s shown he’s worth the extra effort it might take to keep him on side, especially when the squad seems so harmonious at this point in time.

With all of that said, there are some significant non-behavioural reasons the Blues would be better off signing than Villa ace anyway, such as their respective output.

For example, in 54 appearances last season, totalling 4496 minutes, the Claret and Blue’s free-scoring “machine,” as dubbed by The Athletic’s Jacob, put the ball in the back of the net 14 times and provided 15 assists for good measure.

Appearances

54

58

Minutes

4496′

3568′

Goals

14

11

Assists

15

10

Goal Involvements per Match

0.53

0.36

Minutes per Goal Involvement

155.03′

169.90

In other words, the Halesowen-born monster was able to maintain a goal involvement every 1.86 games, or every 155.03 minutes, which is made even more impressive when you consider he was also playing in the Champions League, against sides like Paris Saint-Germain, Bayern Munich and Juventus.

In contrast, the United troublemaker scored 11 goals and provided ten assists in 58 appearances, totalling 3568 minutes, which comes out to a less impressive average of a goal involvement every 2.76 games, or every 169.90 minutes.

What’s important to note here is that six of the Madrid-born ace’s goal involvements came in the League Cup and five came in the Europa League, so not only was he less productive than the Villa dynamo, but he was less productive in far easier competitions.

Ultimately, Garnacho is not a bad player, but however you look at it, Rogers would be the far better signing for Chelsea this summer, even at a substantially higher price.

Better signing than Hato: Chelsea now leading race for £52m PL "nightmare"

The dynamic gem could be something special at Chelsea.

ByJack Salveson Holmes Aug 5, 2025

Chahal stars again as Northants seal three-day win

Scott Currie’s valiant maiden first-class century proved in vain despite helping to stage a remarkable Leicestershire fightback as Northamptonshire completed back-to-back first-class victories for the first time in five years to the day.Sent in as nightwatcher, Currie kept his calm as Leicestershire lost three early wickets on the third morning of this Vitality County Championship match at Wantage Road, slumping to 92 for seven, still 88 runs behind. The arrival of Tom Scriven (48 off 66 balls) heralded a complete change of approach though as he and Currie wrestled back the initiative in an attacking partnership of 101 in 21 overs either side of lunch.With the momentum shifting and Leicestershire building a slender lead, Currie was joined in another big stand worth 110 in 23.3 overs by Sam Wood who smashed 57 off 91 balls (5 fours, 3 sixes). Currie’s lengthy vigil eventually ended after more than four hours at the crease, having faced 192 balls and hit 15 fours and two sixes.Those partnerships allowed Leicestershire to set their hosts 137 to win and while they claimed one early wicket, George Bartlett (54 off 91 balls) and captain Luke Procter (68 off 76 balls) both scored half-centuries in an unbroken stand of 120 to seal victory by nine wickets.Earlier Indian international Yuzvendra Chahal (5 for 134) claimed a five-wicket haul for the second match running, while Northamptonshire stalwart Ben Sanderson also nipped in to claim his 400th career first-class wicket.At the start of the day, Leicestershire resumed on 69 for four, still trailing by 111 runs. They soon lost skipper Lewis Hill (14) as Chahal got into his work. Keeper Lewis McManus completed the stumping as Chahal turned one which pitched on middle and beat Hill’s outside edge.Ben Cox (8) then became Sanderson’s landmark scalp when he was trapped lbw before James Sales took a sharp catch at short leg off Chahal to dismiss Liam Trevaskis (2).Currie, meanwhile, on a season-long loan deal from Hampshire, had proved a stable presence at the other end. He played a textbook cover drive off Sanderson but was otherwise content to bat within himself.Scriven however provided the impetus the innings needed as Leicestershire pressed the accelerator rather than wait for wickets to fall. Scriven took the positive route from the outset, striking Chahal over mid-on to bring up Leicestershire’s 100 in the 58th over, before pulling Sanderson for another four.Currie too started to play his shots. He had made just 16 off 72 balls when the seventh wicket fell, but quickly moved up several gears. He took the attack to Chahal, swinging dismissively through midwicket and dispatching him over long-off. The leg-spinner conceded 19 in one expensive over, as Currie pulled for six before Scriven deployed the slog sweep and reverse sweep for consecutive boundaries to bring up the 50 partnership.While Scriven was dropped at short midwicket, he continued to attack, muscling Chahal over long-on for a huge six as Leicestershire went into lunch on 172 for seven, trailing by just eight runs, an unlikely prospect earlier in the day.They resumed after the interval in bright fashion, Currie driving Justin Broad for four to take Leicestershire into the lead. Broad though soon made the breakthrough, denying Scriven a well-earned half-century when he knocked middle stump out of the ground.Currie continued to find the boundary, pulling Broad confidently before smashing him through deep point as he passed his previous highest best score of 72. He eased into the eighties with a fluent cover drive off Chahal and moved on to his century off 159 balls.Meanwhile, Wood picked up where Scriven had left off, crunching Chahal down the ground for three sixes and cutting and driving fluently along the turf.Chahal finally ended Currie’s long stay, picking up his fifth wicket in the process with one that turned and took the edge to be caught behind by McManus. Louis Kimber came out at number 11 after injuring his hand in the field yesterday and made four before Saif Zaib bowled him to wrap up the innings.Gus Miller (11) kicked off Northamptonshire’s run chase by driving Holland for four but had his stumps rearranged by Wood with the hosts 17 for one, but Bartlett and Procter played the seamers with relative ease, starting to knock off the runs required in ones and twos and some streaky boundaries.Procter greeted Rehan Ahmed by sweeping him high over deep midwicket for six, while Bartlett took another maximum off the England leg spinner a few overs later, this time over long-on. Procter hit Wood for consecutive boundaries to bring up the 100 partnership off 124 deliveries before hitting the winning runs with a boundary down the ground off Sol Budinger. Both not out batters finished with seven fours and one six apiece.

Talks held: Sunderland now moving to sign new overseas players for Le Bris

Sunderland and sporting director Kristjaan Speakman have been in talks about multiple overseas signings in recent days.

Sunderland transfer rumours after Enzo Le Fee deal

The Black Cats are yet to make a major mark in the transfer window so far following promotion to the Premier League, with Enzo Le Fee’s loan move becoming permanent the only piece of incoming business.

Le Fee has penned a four-year deal and has cost around £20m after helping the club win promotion at Wembley. In regards to outgoings, Sunderland have lost playoff hero Tommy Watson and star midfielder Jobe Bellingham, with the pair joining Brighton and Borussia Dortmund respectively.

Le Bris' next Rigg: Sunderland make approach to sign "outstanding" EFL star

Sunderland could be about to win their next Chris Rigg if they successfully sign this EFL ace.

ByKelan Sarson Jun 18, 2025

There have been a number of reported targets at The Stadium of Light, though, as Regis Le Bris prepares his side for a Premier League opener at home to West Ham United on August 16.

Leeds United midfielder Sam Greenwood is a player of interest to Sunderland, as is Sassuolo striker Armand Lauriente.

Celtic centre-back Cameron Carter-Vickers also has admirers from the Black Cats, and by the looks of things, Speakman has been making moves for targets outside of England in recent days.

Speakman confirms transfer talks with Sunderland targets

As reported by The Northern Echo, Speakman confirmed that he has personally been in three different countries this week to talk with targets and their agents.

Although he won’t say what players he has spoken with, The Northern Echo’s Scott Wilson name-checked Ukrainian striker Vladyslav Vanat, Monaco defender Wilfried Singo and Lauriente as targets for Sunderland.

Vanat is currently at the U21 European Championships after scoring 21 goals and registering nine assists for Dynamo Kyiv in all competitions last season.

The 23-year-old could be one that Speakman held talks with, but by the looks of things, transfer business could soon ramp up on Wearside following this update from the Sunderland chief.

"One to watch" – Chelsea may now sell popular international for just £17m

Chelsea have a plethora of players to get off the wage bill before the last summer deadline day on September 1, and their success in selling unwanted players will likely have a real effect on their recruitment plans.

Chelsea players likely to be sold this summer

Alfie Gilchrist, Renato Veiga, Lesley Ugochukwu, Raheem Sterling, João Félix, David Datro Fofana, Carney Chukwuemeka, Ben Chilwell and Axel Disasi could all leave Chelsea this summer, according to a report by The Athletic, with all of these players also missing out on a place in Chelsea’s Club World Cup squad.

"I am told" – Journalist says insiders are shocked by who Chelsea have let go

Many are apparently surprised.

ByEmilio Galantini Jun 12, 2025

Despite actually making the cut to represent Chelsea at the CWC, midfielder Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall and defender Trevoh Chalobah may have key decisions to make about their futures at Stamford Bridge as well.

Dewsbury-Hall started just two of his 13 Premier League appearances last season, playing the vast majority of his minutes in the Conference League, while Chalobah could still be sold by Chelsea despite arguably being one of their best performers during the second half of 2024/2025.

“I suspect that they will try and sell him [Chalobah] because I think that’s what the whole bringing him back was about,” said Telegraph reporter Matt Law on the London is Blue Podcast last month.

Cole Palmer

7.33

Moises Caicedo

7.02

Enzo Fernández

6.95

Nicolas Jackson

6.88

Noni Madueke

6.82

via WhoScored

“I know that they are obviously interested in bringing in one defender. I don’t think it will be two defenders, so I think it will be one defender rather than two unless there are a lot more sales than planned, but I do fear that Trev will be on the up for sale list again. No one can be surprised because it’s the same thing that happens every year.

“I mean, it’s literally, it’s like Groundhog Day with Trev. He becomes the best player of the second half of the season, then they try and sell him.”

Armando Broja is also on the chopping block, with the striker failing to break into the Chelsea first team or replicate his stellar 2021/2022 form, when he enjoyed a productive loan spell at Southampton.

Chelsea to sell Armando Broja for just £17 million this summer

The Albania international commanded huge promise at one point, so much so that Chelsea once put a £50 million price tag on the Cobham academy graduate’s head (The Telegraph).

Now, following two failed loan spells at Fulham and Everton, Chelsea are prepared to sell Broja for just £17 million as they attempt to get him off their books.

Armando Broja

That is according to Sky Germany reporter Florian Plettenberg, who writes that Broja remains in-demand among some circles. The 23-year-old has actually received several enquiries from teams in the Bundesliga and abroad, so Chelsea have an avenue to offload him for good.

The striker would count as pure profit through the lense of PSR given his status as an academy player, but it’s been quite the fall from grace for Broja, who must now look to kickstart his career away from west London.

Fabrizio Romano: £63m star will talk to agents this week about joining Arsenal

Fabrizio Romano has shared an intriguing update on Arsenal and their transfer plans for the summer window, with one target set to speak to his agents about the possibility of a move to the Emirates Stadium this week.

Mikel Arteta set for talks with Arsenal co-chairman over striker plans

The Times and journalist Gary Jacob shared some very interesting news regarding Mikel Arteta and Gunners co-chair Josh Kroenke.

Arsenal: Berta now targeting £80m Premier League star as Rodrygo talks stall

They’re having problems in pursuit of the Brazilian.

ByEmilio Galantini May 26, 2025

According to their information, amid a plethora of reports linking them with a striker, Arteta and Kroenke are set for internal talks over signing a prolific centre-forward in the next few days, with Arsenal looking to solve their goalscoring problem.

Arsenal surrendered the Premier League title to Liverpool, finishing 10 points behind Arne Slot’s side, with the north Londoners failing to reach their previous heights in terms of ruthlessness in the final third.

Arsenal transfer spending under Arteta (via Sky Sports)

Money on new signings

19/20 – winter

£0

20/21 – summer

£81.5m

20/21 – winter

£900k

21/22 – summer

£156.8m

21/22 – winter

£1.8m

22/23 – summer

£121.5m

22/23 – winter

£59m

23/24 – summer

£208m

23/24 – winter

£0

24/25 – summer

£101.5m

24/25 – winter

£0

Arteta’s men drew more games than any other side in the top ten over 24/25, scoring just 69 league goals in total, which is far fewer than the 91 and 88 they managed over the previous two seasons.

There has never been a more clear indication that Arsenal are in dire need of a striker, and Arteta publicly suggested that they have every intention of solving that issue among other concerns in the squad.

“Believe me, we are on it,” said Arteta about Arsenal potentially making a signing up front.

Arsenal manager MikelArteta

“We will try to squeeze and think and turn every stone that we possibly can, to make this club even more successful. But I think what these boys have done, the team has done, regarding everything that has happened, I repeat myself, I think they deserve a lot of credit.”

The result of these sit-down talks with Kroenke could have a profound effect on their chances of mounting a better Premier League title challenge next season, amid serious links to Sporting CP star Viktor Gyokeres.

Viktor Gyokeres set to speak with agents about possible Arsenal move

The Swede ended 24/25 with 54 goals and 13 assists in all competitions, potentially signing-off on his Sporting career with a strike in the Portuguese Cup final against Benfica on Sunday.

Gyokeres is a top striker target for Arsenal, alongside RB Leipzig’s Benjamin Sesko, but it remains to be seen which marksman ends up at N5.

The 26-year-old has plenty of options, including Arteta’s side, with Romano sharing an update to GiveMeSport on Gyokeres’ plans after what was potentially his last game for Sporting.

Romano reports that Gyokeres is set to speak with his agents “in the next days” and assess all new destinations, including a possible move to Arsenal, and the ex-Coventry City star will make a decision on his next club “soon”.

Gyokeres’ rumoured price tag comes in at around £63 million, which could be seen as a bargain considering his exceptional goalscoring record, and it is peculiar that he hasn’t managed to seal a big-money move until this summer.

It adds further weight to some belief that Gyokeres is “massively underrated” in terms of strikers, and while you can make a case for a lack of quality in the Primeira Liga, the forward’s haul is hugely impressive no matter what division you’re playing in.

Contact made: Chelsea enquire over deal for "world-class" £67m goalkeeper

Chelsea have now made contact to ask for information about a “world-class” player, ahead of a potential summer transfer swoop, according to a report.

Blues pushing for Champions League

Despite the drab 0-0 draw against Brentford at the weekend, the Blues remain in a strong position to end their two-year hiatus from the Champions League, sitting fourth in the Premier League table with just seven games left to play.

Should Enzo Maresca achieve his aim of Champions League qualification, the campaign will probably go down as a success, but there are still issues the manager will need to address in the summer transfer window.

One problem position has been goalkeeper, with Robert Sanchez and Filip Jorgensen being used interchangeably, and there have been suggestions Maresca could bring Djordje Petrovic back into the fold next season.

New target: Chelsea eye move for £50m star who's "similar to Bellingham"

The Blues have set their sights on an “incredible” midfielder, who has been compared to Real Madrid star Jude Bellingham.

By
Dominic Lund

Apr 7, 2025

Petrovic has impressed on loan at Strasbourg, meaning he could also be given another chance at Stamford Bridge. Nonetheless, the option of bringing in a new goalkeeper from elsewhere remains on the table.

According to a report from Italy (via Chelsea Chronicle), Chelsea have now asked for information about AC Milan goalkeeper Mike Maignan, ahead of a potential summer transfer swoop.

AC Milan's MikeMaignanreacts

Aston Villa and Manchester United have also been named as potential suitors for Maignan, whose future at the San Siro remains up in the air, given that he is yet to sign a new deal to extend his stay with the Italian club.

Reports have valued the goalkeeper at £67m, but there is a feeling he could be available for half that price, should he refuse to put pen to paper on a new deal, with his contract currently set to expire in 2026.

"World-class" Maignan could be real upgrade on Sanchez

Sanchez has been extremely error-prone for the Blues this season, making five mistakes which have directly led to goals in the Premier League, the joint-highest number of any player in the top flight.

As such, it is little wonder Chelsea are thinking about signing a replacement in the summer window, and there are indications Maignan could be a real upgrade on the Spaniard, considering he has been lauded as “world-class” by members of the Italian media.

Not only that, but the Frenchman could be well-suited to Maresca’s passing style of play, given that he has expressed a willingness to get on the ball over the past year, ranking in the 80th percentile for touches, when compared to his positional peers.

It is clear that Sanchez will need to be replaced this summer, and Maignan has proven he could be a solid replacement, although it may make more financial sense to give the nod to Petrovic, who has put in some very impressive displays in Ligue 1 this season.

The Ashes before the Ashes: the Aussie farmers who beat the English pros

The tale of a Goliath-slaying by two dozen Davids of Castlemaine, Victoria, in 1862

Geoff Lemon and Adam Collins16-Nov-2025We tell a lot of Ashes stories. But Australia and England faced each other on five Test tours before the Ashes legend was created, and earlier still, before the Test era, three other teams from England visited the colonies. Let’s go back to the first of these, and one of the biggest upsets of them all.Cricket in the 1800s was mostly public entertainment offered by private operators. The modern spectator might not part with their cash to watch a few gents batting with twigs scoring one run per over on a rural shitheap, but in that era there was rarely much to do except catch the plague and talk to sheep. So teams travelled all over, partly made up of working-class professional players, partly of upper-class supposed amateurs, who were usually discreetly paid “expenses” that greatly exceeded their team-mates’ wages. If crowds turned up and paid entry, tours were lucrative. If not, they lost money heavily.Nor was touring specific to cricket. Musicians, actors, sideshows, demonstrations of strength or skill – all sorts of performers traipsed from town to town looking for their next payday. And with international maritime transport having become commonplace, big attractions from England could make big money elsewhere.This earning potential drew the interest of two Melbourne restaurant owners, Mr Spiers and Mr Pond. It was 1862, the gold rush was ending and a depression was on the way. These two wanted to diversify. Originally they invited novelist Charles Dickens for a speaking and reading tour. He was interested but the plan fell through. As they cast around for alternatives, they heard a story from 1859, when cricket touring had first gone international. An All-England team went to North America, including a chap whose name offered classic English floridity: Heathfield Harman Stephenson. The tour had made bank. Spiers and Pond were down. They offered Stevo a gig.Our bloke had a long all-round career bowling what was recorded as “round-arm fast”. Make of that what you will: we guess that his pace was pedestrian at best, but the ratty pitches of the day made it do all sorts. He played for nearly 20 years, a lot for Surrey with a bunch of other sides thrown in, including England representative teams against county opponents. With international cricket not yet born, that was the highest you could go: an England player without a Test cap. He did allegedly get bought a fancy hat once, by crowd donation, after taking three wickets in three balls, which is one of the unproven theories about why we call it a “hat-trick”. And he definitely umpired the first Test ever played in England.Spiers and Pond made a good bet. When Stevo’s team of Englishmen arrived, it was huge news. Melbourne’s population was 125,000, and an estimated 10,000 of them came to the docks to greet the team’s ship. For the opening match against a Victorian side, 15,000 showed up, and the estimate over four days was 55,000. That included the governor, the premier, and cabinet ministers. It was a carnival, with one lunch break including the country’s first ascent of a hot-air balloon.Related

What do we know about the first Test cricketer?

Did England experiment with pinch-hitting in the 19th century? (2016)

When Dickens shouldered arms (2012)

Described by English player William Caffyn, the scene on morning one sounded no different to Boxing Day morning now: “The National Anthem was played as we entered the field, amidst the silence of the vast concourse of spectators. When the band stopped playing a tremendous burst of cheering rent the air. The weather was so hot as to fetch the skin off some of our faces.”The Vics got pumped, their second innings including ten ducks and a nought not out. Does that mean they didn’t make any runs? No, they made 91, because they had 18 players. This was the other factor. The touring team was made of hardened county players, and a money-making trip needed the promise of competitiveness. So teams like these would travel to any town, field their best 11 and let the hosts play 15 or 18 or 22. A sporting handicap let the pros show off their skills without a mismatch ending the game too quickly.The team went all over: Ovens District, Geelong, Bathurst, Hobart, Ballarat, Bendigo, and several bigger games in Melbourne and Sydney. As the far more powerful side, they kept playing against teams with more players and kept beating them, often by an innings. They lost twice all tour. The first took a combined team from the best of Victoria and New South Wales, fielding 22 players to the English 11, that still barely scraped over the line. Ending at 35 for 9 in the chase, with nobody having passed single figures, the colonial team probably would have lost if chasing 30 more.The other loss, though, was right at the other end of the scale for supposed advantage. Yes, it was still to 22 players, but they were 22 farmers and knockabouts, residents of the small Victorian town of Castlemaine, who made their fortress at the local ground named Wattle Flat.Everyone was there. “On the occasion of the grand match yesterday, business was almost entirely suspended in the town, and most of the surrounding districts were similarly affected,” reported the . England got bowled out for 80, but that wasn’t a bad score in that era. A feller from down the road at Fryers Creek named John Webster Amos took 7 for 13.But as soon as England took the ball, Stevo nabbed the first wicket, and boy did it roll on. For a sequence on a scorecard, try reading this aloud. 0, 5, 0, 17, 3, 2, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 10, 1, 0, 1, 0, 2, 3 not out, 1, 0, 1, 0.So that’s ten ducks and five ones, out of 22 batters, in a score of 54. George Griffith for the tourists took 13 wickets for 18 runs, and while the scorer might just have got lazy noting down catches, the card suggests that 12 of them were bowled. It must have been a brutal effort to be subjected to, and on that showing, a deficit of 26 for Castlemaine might as well have been a thousand.

Our research might be faulty, but apparently teams of 22 players didn’t just have a longer batting order; they were allowed to have them all fielding at the same time. These English pros would have been trying to work the ball into the smallest gaps or hit over thickets of fielders

But the local lads were not discouraged. Our friend Amos only added one wicket in the third innings, but his team-mate John Brooker cleaned up with 6 for 6. That kept the English to a manageable 68, and Stevo was pissed. The skipper, reported the local paper, spouted off at the lunch break: “in explanation of the bad fortune that had attended the Englishmen in that day’s play, [Stephenson] said that he attributed it entirely to the bad ground”. Sure, classic – blame the facilities.Picture the chaos of this match. Our research might be faulty, but apparently teams of 22 players didn’t just have a longer batting order; they were allowed to have them all fielding at the same time. These English pros would have been trying to work the ball into the smallest gaps or hit over thickets of fielders. In the meantime, the whole third innings happened on the Saturday, so the entire town and district would have been down there cheering every wicket. The home team would have merged into the home supporters near the boundary line, an indistinguishable and claustrophobic mass of humanity surrounding them.Even so, when normal service resumed in the fourth innings with the regulation 13 players on the pitch, the scores in the match and Castlemaine’s first showing with the bat suggested that 95 was too many to chase. But by stumps on Saturday, they were still in the game at 40 for 4. In the circumstances, first drop Robert Manning making 11 was a significant score. More importantly, Charles Makinson – who would later play twice for Victoria – was 19 not out. The town sat through church on Sunday daring to hope.On Monday, Makinson went on to 36, including the only boundary of the innings, before being bowled. The card proceeded much like the first innings: 4, 0, 3, 2, 3, 1, 1, 2, 0, 0, 1, 3. But, crucially, there were fewer ducks. Each tiny score brought the target closer. Between times they kept hustling, taking byes and leg-byes, the extras total mounting past 10, past 15, up towards 20. But the wicket column was doing the same. Castlemaine had already been hurt up top by Griffith again, then saw a run of wickets through the middle for Charles Lawrence, who went on to emigrate to Australia and would later captain the Aboriginal XI tour to England of 1868.Lawrence bagged the 14th wicket, the 15th, the 16th. Nerves jangled. A tiny partnership of 6 or 7 saw the score creep within a few runs of the target. Then another wicket for Lawrence, dismissing the player for 3, and another for Griffith, a duck.Castlemaine had their No. 20 at the crease, with two left in the sheds. Being carded at 21 or 22 would not do wonders for the confidence. Those three players collectively had scored one run in the first innings. But out there with them was the fabulously named Joseph Dolphin, ready to launch a Flipper rescue. Sure, his innings totalled 6 not out, but it was a 6 not out that would reverberate through the life of the town. With the winning strike, Dolphin carried Castlemaine past their target, not to 95 runs but to 96. Like Forrest Gump, he just kept on running.Affirm PressSo the boys from Castlemaine won the match at Wattle Flat, defeating England’s finest by making 150 runs across two innings. Griffith added 9 for 28 in the second dig, another seven of them bowled, so had match figures of 22 wickets for 46, but the locals were still the ones who got to celebrate.”It has been reserved for the Castlemaine district to achieve a victory which other much more pretentious districts failed to win,” crowed the . They were less happy about the English blaming the deck. “It strikes us that this mode of accounting for the victory of the Castlemaine men sounds very like twaddle,” the paper continued. “No doubt it is annoying to be defeated by a number of amateur cricketers, but… whatever might have been the demerits of the ground, it was played on by both sides.”Ding ding ding, cricket cliché jar. A hundred years later, the people of Castlemaine were still sufficiently pleased with themselves to put up a plaque commemorating the win, which England’s then-captain Colin Cowdrey agreed to unveil. He was the fifth touring skipper to visit Castlemaine, because such was the respect given to Wattle Flat following Stevo’s trip that three later touring sides also played matches there, the little ground hosting some of the greatest to play the game.WG Grace took his team there in 1874, and his key bowler was England’s first Test captain, James Lillywhite, who took ten wickets in each innings. Ivo Bligh’s team played Castlemaine during the first Ashes tour in 1882, and in 1887, cricket’s great party boy AE Stoddart walked away with 8 for 27, and we can only hope that Castlemaine then gave him a good night on the tiles.The team continued to hold its own, with Grace’s team winning narrowly and the other two matches drawn. Eventually, Wattle Flat cricket ground became a pony club and a recreation area, and there is no longer an oval where those games were played. But they say that some ghosts may be heard when you pass by the cricket ground: mostly Heathfield Harman Stephenson complaining about the pitch.

Has Virat Kohli done enough to be called the greatest ODI batter ever?

As ever with these things, the competition is with Sachin Tendulkar. AB de Villiers and Viv Richards come into the picture too

Kartikeya Date01-Nov-2023Should India continue to have a great World Cup, come November 19 there will be a strong case for considering Virat Kohli the greatest ODI batter in history. The consistency, longevity and speed of his run production make him a solid contender for this unofficial title.Kohli now has 13,437 career ODI runs at 58 runs per wicket and about 94 runs per 100 balls faced. He has been in red-hot form in ODIs in 2023, and at the time of writing, he has 48 ODI hundreds, one short of Sachin Tendulkar’s record. He is currently about 5000 runs short of Tendulkar’s career aggregate of 18,426 runs and only 797 short of the second-placed batter on that table – Kumar Sangakkara, who has 14,234.ODI cricket has seen significant run inflation due to changes in rules governing field settings and ball use, apart from improvement in bats and the emergence of the power game. One way to account for this inflation (the average ODI scoring rate in the 1980s was 4.4 runs per over; in the 2010s it rose to 5.2 runs per over) is to normalise the scoring rate and batting average for each player relative to that of their team-mates in matches involving that player.For example, Rahul Dravid batted 344 times in ODIs and made 10,889 runs at an average of 39.2 and strike rate of 71.2. In those matches, the other ten India players and extras made runs at an average of 31.5 and strike rate of 86.2. Dravid’s average was 24.4% better (or positive) than that of the other ten India players, and his scoring rate was 17.4% worse (or negative).Kartikeya DateGraph 1: All 60 ODI batters who have at least 6500 career runs are organised by the difference between their batting average and that of the rest of their team, and the difference between their scoring rate and that of the rest of their team in matches involving that batter. All figures are percentages of the rest of the team’s figures.In the graph above, we see the 60 most prolific ODI batters, from Tendulkar (18,426 career runs) to Allan Border (6524 career runs) organised according to their batting average difference and scoring-rate difference. The players in blue make up the bulk of this group – 44 out of the 60, who, like Dravid, were more consistent than their average team-mate but scored slower. The two who were less consistent than their team-mates but scored quicker are Adam Gilchrist and Shahid Afridi (in yellow). There are 14 players (in red) who are both more consistent and score quicker than their team-mates. The large blue dot represents Virat Kohli’s record at No. 3, and the large red dot represents Tendulkar’s record as opener.The 14 players who are both more consistent (better average) and score quicker than their team-mates are listed in the table below. This list includes some players who played in relatively weak sides, like Brendan Taylor of Zimbabwe, Shakib Al Hasan of Bangladesh, Arjuna Ranatunga of Sri Lanka, and Chris Gayle of West Indies. Their individual records are not exceptional for their era, but they stand out in their respective teams.

Two players – AB de Villiers and Viv Richards – stand out more generally. By any measure, without bringing longevity into it, these are the two greatest ODI batters in the history of the format. De Villiers and Richards were both nearly 50% more consistent than their team-mates and scored between 11% and 24% quicker than them.Tendulkar played ODI cricket for nearly a quarter of a century and opened the batting for India for nearly 20 years. His career runs aggregate figure will probably never be approached by another player. The closest active batter, Kohli, is nearly 5000 runs away. Even at today’s rate, Kohli will have to play about 120 more ODIs to score those 5000 runs.Two players – Sanath Jayasuriya and Virender Sehwag – are noteworthy on the table. They are the only ones who are further ahead of their team-mates on scoring rate than on batting average. They, along with Gilchrist and Afridi, made a different choice compared to the other players in the table (and most of the 60 ODI players in the graph).The numbers of these four players (all openers in the main, except for Afridi, who opened for 3543 of his 8064 runs) point to the essential trade-off between speed and consistency in ODI cricket. There is little threat of dismissal for a batter for large parts of an ODI innings. Field settings are designed to prevent boundaries, and even the updates in the powerplay rules have not changed the tendency of fielding sides to prefer containment. It is exceedingly rare for a fielding side to have more fielders than required within the 30-yard circle; catching fielders are just as rare. The threat of dismissal in ODIs comes from the batter’s need to score quickly. The best players are those who score quickly without sacrificing consistency.Setting aside both Richards and de Villiers for now, both Kohli and Tendulkar excel in particular positions. Tendulkar made 15,310 runs as opener (more than any other player overall), while Kohli has now made 11,316 runs at No. 3, at an average of 61. Even accounting for inflation, maintaining such consistency over 223 innings, as he has done, is a remarkable feat of consistency.The graph below shows the record for each player from World Cup to World Cup in their most favoured position. The data used in the graph follows in the table a few paragraphs later.Kartikeya DateGraph 2: Consistency and speed in run-scoring for Sachin Tendulkar (as opener) and Virat Kohli (at No. 3) from World Cup to World Cup. 1992-1996 includes matches played from after the end of the 1992 World Cup to the end of the 1996 World Cup. The spans are bracketed by the relevant World Cup years. Tendulkar played his last qualifying ODI in 2012 and Kohli played his first in 2009. Tendulkar opened from 1994 through 2012.The striking thing about Kohli’s record is that he has been consistent. He has either been very consistent (as he was in the 2011-15 phase, the 2009-11 phase, or the 2019-23 phase), or off-the-charts consistent, as he was in the 2015-19 phase. The scoring rate has never been an issue because the run production at the other end matched Kohli’s run production. In other words, he was not responsible for providing both speed and consistency to his team.With Tendulkar, it was a different story. From the time he began to open, till about the 2003 World Cup, he was responsible for providing both speed and consistency to the Indian batting. He did this with extraordinary success. From 1994 to the end of the 2003 World Cup, he made 9416 runs at an average of 50 and a strike rate of 90. No other player approached this combination of speed and consistency. To see how extraordinary this decade was for Tendulkar, consider that de Villiers’ run production was 49% more consistent, and 11% quicker than his team-mates’ over his 9577 run ODI career, while Tendulkar was 60% more consistent and 11% quicker over a similar number of runs during this period.

The table above considers Kohli and Tendulkar in their best batting positions (No. 3 for Kohli, and opener for Tendulkar). The year spans are from World Cup year to World Cup year, as that is how the record is organised. Readers should note that Kohli did not bat at No. 3 in 2008 (when he made his ODI debut), and Tendulkar began to open in 1994.After the 2003 World Cup, we saw a different Tendulkar. He was still highly consistent but, especially once he returned from injury in 2006, India had Suresh Raina, Yuvraj Singh and Mahendra Singh Dhoni, who all scored extremely quickly. Kohli’s career has been played out in an Indian batting line-up similar to the one Tendulkar played in, especially from about 2006 through 2013. India have had plenty of fast-scoring players, so much so that eventually, even the power-packed Dhoni could afford to sit back and allow others to take chances.Playing in a strong team narrows the range of challenges a batter faces. But there’s not much Kohli can do about the fact that the India side he has played in has always been one of the best two in the world. Nevertheless, it remains the case that for nearly a decade and over 9000 runs, Tendulkar met the dual challenge of being a consistent and quick run-scorer in a way no player apart from Richards did in the history of the ODI game.Tendulkar, unlike Kohli, needed to bear the burden of scoring quickly (because his team-mates mostly couldn’t) while also being consistent•AFPWhen I last considered the question of Kohli’s place in the pantheon in an article about six years ago, his extraordinary (but relatively brief) record of about eight years at the time placed him first among equals. In 2023, his longevity places him, without question, among the all-time greats.Is he the greatest ODI batter of all time? With 48 ODI hundreds (at one every six innings) and over 13,000 runs, Kohli’s is an epic career. Given his longevity, Kohli is probably Tendulkar’s equal as an ODI batter overall, even accounting for run inflation. But Tendulkar’s career lasted nearly a quarter of a century. Kohli would have to play a further 176 ODIs (Richards’ whole career almost) to play as many as Tendulkar did, and he would have to make about 5000 more runs to reach Tendulkar’s aggregate. But even if he did all that, and matched Tendulkar’s longevity, there is still the small matter of that extraordinary decade for us to contend with.Kohli is a better ODI player than Tendulkar was in the last decade of his colossal career. But from 1994 to 2003, over his first 204 innings as opener, ending in the 2003 World Cup final, Tendulkar achieved heights matched only by de Villiers, and surpassed only by Richards. Are there periods in Kohli’s career when he achieved these heights? As the record above shows, needing to score quickly has never really been a challenge for Kohli, because in every Indian team he played in, the runs came just as quickly, if not more quickly, at the other end.Players who play in ODI teams where their team-mates score at about the same speed can choose more carefully when to take chances than players in teams where their team-mates score slower. In the last ten years of his career, Tendulkar had that luxury because several other players were good enough to take those chances (and in Virender Sehwag’s case, made a habit of it). Kohli has always had that luxury. From 1994 to 2003, Tendulkar didn’t have it. The record he produced during that decade places him, in my view, one small rung above Virat Kohli in the ODI pantheon.

New Zealand's 62 all out: The lowest total in a Test match in India

A set of ignominious records that the Black Caps now own after their dismal display in Mumbai

Sampath Bandarupalli04-Dec-20212:50

Vettori: Great day for Ajaz but poor for New Zealand

62 New Zealand’s total in the first innings in Mumbai, the lowest in Tests played in India. The previous was 75 by the home team against West Indies in Delhi in 1975.Watch live cricket on ESPN+ in the US

India vs New Zealand is available in the US on ESPN+. You can subscribe to ESPN+ and tune in to highlights of day two of the 2nd Test in English or in Hindi.

62 New Zealand’s 62 is also the lowest total by any team against India in Test cricket, South Africa’s 79 in 2015 in Nagpur being the previous lowest. Two of the three lowest Test totals against India came in 2021 with England all out for 81 in February this year.1 Instance of New Zealand registering a total lower than 62 since 1959, when they were bowled out for 45 against South Africa in 2013 in Cape Town. Until 1958, New Zealand had as many as four all-out totals in Tests which were lower than 62.1 All-out total lower than New Zealand’s 62 in the subcontinent. Pakistan held West Indies to just 53 runs in 1986 in Faisalabad. New Zealand’s total in Mumbai is also the joint fourth-lowest total in Tests in Asia with Pakistan recording totals of 59 and 53 respectively against Australia in the Sharjah Test in 2002.28.1 Overs faced by New Zealand during their first innings. Only South Africa (19.2) and England (22.3) have dismissed them in fewer overs. They faced 27 overs while registering the lowest total ever – 26 all out against England in 1955. The 28.1 overs at Wankhede are third-fewest India needed to bowl out an opponent at home in Test cricket.17 The lowest highest individual score in an all-out innings against India in Tests. It belongs to Kyle Jamieson now. Only once had India bowled an opposition out with no batter reaching 20 runs – in Melbourne 1981 when Doug Walters was Australia’s top-scorer in the second innings with 18*.325 India’s first-innings total is the second-lowest for any team to end up with a lead of 250-plus runs. Australia, in Sharjah in 2002, earned a lead of 251 runs after bundling Pakistan out for 59 while bowling first.332 India’s lead at the end of the second day, the highest they have taken at this stage in a Test match. The only other instance of India leading by 300-plus runs in the second innings by stumps on day two was against South Africa in 2006 (311).

Tigers Rookie Troy Melton Sings Blink-182 While Exciting Biggest Start of His Career

The Tigers had lost eight consecutive games entering Thursday night's matchup with the Guardians in Cleveland. Once up by 15.5 games in the American League Central, Detroit needed a win in order to get back even with the Guardians as the regular season enters its final weekend. A.J. Hinch turned to rookie Troy Melton to deliver in the biggest spot of the year and the young righthander rewarded that confidence by throwing 3 2/3 innings and surrendering a single run.

Upon getting relieved from the game, Melton savored the moment by singing along to Blink-182's "All The Small Things" as it blared throughout the stadium.

Here's that cool moment.

Detroit and Cleveland now have a three-game race to the division crown. The Guardians hold the tiebreaker so it would have been all but over had Melton not stepped in to stop the historic skid. It's a good sign for the Tigers that Melton can be this cool in such a huge moment.

And kudos to the Fan Duel Sports Detroit broadcast for catching on to what was happening.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus